![]() ![]() ON1 Photo RAW had its flaws as well, but can serve as a single-program replacement for both Lightroom and Photoshop.ACDSee Photo Studio, Exposure X7,and Luminar Neo produced good results, but all had flaws.The Adobe alternatives that provided the best raw image quality in my test nightscapes were Capture One and DxO PhotoLab.Though, as I’ve discovered, AI processing can ruin astrophotos if not applied carefully. Adobe Camera Raw (or its equivalent in Adobe Lightroom) still produces superb results, lacking only the latest in AI noise reduction, sharpening and special effects.Here’s a summary of my recommendations, with the evidence for my conclusions presented at length (!) in the sections that follow: Instead, the orthodox workflow is to stack and align undeveloped raw files with specialized “calibration” software such as DeepSkyStacker or PixInsight that outputs 16-bit or 32-bit TIFFs, bypassing any chance to work with the raw files. The reason - most deep-sky astrophotographers never use a raw developer anyway. NOTE: I did not test the programs with telescope images of nebulas or galaxies. I also looked at features for preparing and exporting a large batch of images to assemble into time-lapse movies, though the actual movie creation usually requires specialized software. I tested all the programs strictly for the purpose of processing, or “developing” raw files, using nightscape images as the tests. ![]() In addition to Adobe Camera Raw (represented by the Adobe Bridge icon), I tested, in alphabetical order, and from left to right in the icons above: I tested only programs that are offered for both MacOS and Windows, with identical or nearly identical features for both platforms. I tested them primarily on sample nightscape images described below. To find out, I compared eight programs, pitting them against what I still consider the standard for image quality when developing raw files, Adobe Camera Raw (the Develop module in Adobe Lightroom is essentially identical). How well do the latest versions of those programs compare now for astrophotography? And what new software choices do we have as we head into 2023? But 2017 was ages ago in the lifetime of software. You can find that earlier survey here on my blog. Patience!Īs a background, in December 2017 I tested ten contenders vying to be alternatives to Adobe’s suite of software. The review is illustrated with 50 high-resolution, downloadable images which will take a while to load. Warning! This is a long and technical blog, but for those interested in picking the best software, I think you’ll find it the most comprehensive test of programs for processing nightscapes. You click on the segment you want to mask, and the app builds a high-quality mask automatically.I test nine programs for processing raw files for the demands of nightscape astrophotography. However, Quick Mask AI is faster and more intuitive than before. Mask AI is new, whereas Quick Mask AI isn't. These tools use machine learning to analyze and segment photos and identify objects like people, animals, flora, the sky, mountains, water, ground and more. ON1 Photo RAW 2023 doesn't require users to perform manual brushing and masking – although you can manually mask if you want – thanks to features like Mask AI and Quick Mask AI. I couldn’t be more excited about getting this version into your hands," says Craig Keudell, ON1 President. These new tools will enhance the creative eye we all have, and it's going to be so much fun to edit photos and achieve the results you envision in a fraction of the time it used to take. Using AI models removes many of the difficulties of traditional editing without taking away the creative flexibility photographers want. New tools like Super Select AI, Mask AI, and AI Adaptive Presets will save you an enormous amount of time and put the joy back into editing your photos. "The introduction of AI-powered semantic masking to the ON1 Photo RAW workflow will change your approach to editing photos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |